Wednesday night’s Vice Presidential debate saw Kamala Harris and Mike Pence go head-to-head in a tense and often contentious exchange. While the candidates engaged in a heated battle over policy and rhetoric, it was the moderators, CBS News’ Margaret Brennan and Norah O’Donnell, who ultimately stood out.

Both Brennan and O’Donnell navigated the sometimes chaotic debate with commendable professionalism. They maintained order, enforced time limits, and kept the focus on substantive issues, offering the audience a chance to hear both candidates’ positions on key topics. The moderators were especially effective in demanding accountability, forcing both candidates to confront their own records and statements.

While some critics have argued that the moderators should have stepped in more forcefully to correct false or misleading statements, others have praised their ability to remain neutral and let the candidates speak for themselves. This approach allowed viewers to form their own conclusions about the candidates’ arguments and positions.

In a year where the political climate is particularly volatile, it’s important to acknowledge the vital role that moderators play in shaping the national dialogue. Brennan and O’Donnell provided a platform for the candidates to express their views, but also held them to account, ultimately delivering a debate that was both informative and engaging.

Though the candidates may disagree on the substance of their arguments, it’s clear that the moderators, Brennan and O’Donnell, emerged from the debate with a sense of accomplishment and a stronger public profile. Their performance serves as a reminder of the vital role of impartial journalism in a democracy.